Teen Mom Star Amber Portwood LOSES Custody Of 4-Year-Old To Ex Andrew Glennon!

Wow! After three long years, a judge has finally decided on Teen Mom star Amber Portwood’s custody battle with ex Andrew Glennon — and things did NOT go down in her favor! According to court documents obtained by The Sun on Tuesday, an Indiana court granted Andrew sole legal and physical custody of the exes’ […]

Read More…

The post <i>Teen Mom</i> Star Amber Portwood LOSES Custody Of 4-Year-Old To Ex Andrew Glennon! appeared first on Perez Hilton.

Chelsea Handler Reveals Reason She Broke Up With Jo Koy: ‘I Have To Choose Myself’

Chelsea Handler is opening up about her split from Jo Koy. In case you haven’t been following, news broke Monday that the comedian couple had decided to go their separate ways despite their beautiful connection and history. While they seemingly left on great terms, they didn’t provide a specific reason for their breakup. And these […]

Read More…

The post Chelsea Handler Reveals Reason She Broke Up With Jo Koy: ‘I Have To Choose Myself’ appeared first on Perez Hilton.

Amber Portwood Demands Andrew Glennon Pay Thousands: He Accused Me of Abuse!

The ongoing legal struggle between Amber Portwood and Andrew Glennon has included alarming accusations and a lot of bitter feelings.

There are very serious issues at the heart of their custody battle, some of which include reasonable concerns about James’ safety.

We all remember how Andrew once implied that Amber’s infamous violence may have been directed at her son at one point.

Now, Amber is demanding that Andrew pay her thousands of dollars over that post.

“You hit your baby boy? Really?” Andrew Glennon’s Instagram Story read back in August of 2021.

He did not actually name Amber, or even the boy in question.

But it is only natural that people would conclude that Andrew was accusing Amber of abusing their won, even if he did not say so.

Andrew accusing Amber

Now, The Sun reports that Amber Portwood is going after him in court.

She is demanding that her ex be held in contempt of court and required to pay $5,000.

In her court filing, she says that Andrew “violated” the law when he shared this “negative” Instagram post about her.

According to Amber, Andrew violated guidelines by “posting negative allegations about a parent on online forums.”

She claimed that this is something “which is harmful to the parties’ child.”

In this case, the allegation is that any badmouthing that either of them do in public is detrimental to James’ well-being.

According to Amber’s filing, in August of 2021, she told Andrew that their child, James, had a “sore on the inside of his lip.”

Per the documents, “After the parenting time exchange at 7:53 PM, Father accusted Mother of hitting James in their communication.”

The filing continues: “Less than 30 minutes later … Father made an Instagram post that stated, ‘You hit your baby boy? … Really?!'”

During the March hearing, Andrew denied that the deleted Instagram Story was about Amber.

But Amber wants him held in contempt of court.

If she gets her wish, Andrew will be required to pay her attorney’s fees — giving him 90 days to hand over $5,000.

Notably, this conflict is not about the allegation that Andrew allegedly made towards Amber.

She’s accusing him of making a negative public statement about her.

Some might say that by identifying herself as the perpetrator in his vague post, she’s telling on herself, but that might be splitting hairs too finely for the legal system.

It is not surprising to hear Amber accused of domestic violence.

Some may think that she only targets the men in her life — first Gary Shirley, then Andrew Glennon — with abuse.

But Teen Mom viewers remember Amber angrily encouraging Gary to use violence against then-little Leah Portwood, so evil of this magnitude is not unthinkable.

Obviously, we cannot help but think of a recent, obnoxiously well-publicized celebrity trial in which one party was sued for defamation.

In that case, as you may recall, an actress acknowledged that she has become associated with domestic violence stories.

Her ex’s victory over her during the lawsuit might not stand up to appeal, but seems likely to inspire other lawsuits against people who speak out similarly.

Unlike, say, Marilyn Manson’s lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood, possible action that Tory Lanez might take against Megan Thee Stallion, or others, Amber is a woman.

She also took a plea deal following her domestic battery of Andrew during their relationship, so she’s not fighting that accusation.

But despite these differences, the if you talk about me even indirectly, I will take you to court vibes are eerily similar.

That said, this is also a custody battle. For better or for worse, they are both James’ parents.

Maybe James making an accusation like that … however indirectly … violated some court agreement.

But honestly, most of us are more concerned about James’ actual safety than we are about quibbling over last year’s Instagram Stories.

Andrew Glennon Has Recording of Amber Portwood: She Threatened to Slit My Throat

No one is more proud of Amber Portwood’s growth and accomplishments than Amber herself.

As wonderful as that is, it does not erase the past — or make it any less relevant to how people view her, or to how the court rules on custody.

Amber’s violent past is not in question, but Andrew Glennon says that the court does not yet know the extent of it.

In court, he recalled an incident where Amber threatened to slit his throat in his sleep — and revealed that he has the audio to prove it.

Amber Portwood and Andrew Glennon continue to duke it out in court.

Andrew hopes to move to California, where he has job offers on the table, and wants to take 3-year-old son James with him.

Amber is fighting that, hoping to keep James in Indiana where she lives.

The Sun reports that Andrew offered testimony to the judge about an alleged incident that took place months before Amber’s domestic violence arrest.

On April 15 of 2019, Amber allegedly threatened to do bodily harm to James in very explicit terms.

Andrew provided the court details … and offered up an audio recording.

“The audio ends with her saying ‘I’m going to f–king stab you,'” Andrew testified.

“She said she will slit my throat in my sleep,” he continued.

Those are extremely alarming and specific-sounding threats, if Andrew’s allegations are true.

Amber’s attorney hit back, demanding to know from Andrew if Amber had made these alleged threats after telling him to get away from her.

Andrew replied: “I don’t know.”

The attorney then suggested that Amber was “not aware she was being recorded,” prompting Andrew to say “no,” indicating that he believes that she knew.

That particular exchange at first appears to be about whether the recording is legal.

However, Indiana is a one-party consent state, meaning that if even one person in a conversation consents to being recorded, it is legal to do so.

We are not legal experts, but are unaware of any specifics in Indiana law or in Andrew and Amber’s situation that would make the recording inadmissible even if Amber didn’t know about it.

Andrew’s team asked that the audio evidence be played in court and entered into the record.

Amber’s side of course fought back, asking the court to refuse to admit the evidence.

The judge ruled that the audio will be “admitted over the objection of the mother,” indicating plans to “listen to the recoding after the conclusion of these proceedings.”

The judge clarified: “I will be listening to them outside of the record.”

The significance here, beyond the judge hearing it, is that Andrew’s attorney will be able to ask questions pertaining to the recording’s contents.

In turn, Amber’s legal team will be able to bring up the audio recording as well.

This matters because evidence must be admitted by the court in order for it to be fair game.

One cannot have one or both sides of a legal struggle constantly referring to something — a book, a recording, a piece of art — if the court has no frame of reference.

Assuming that Andrew’s description of the audio recording is accurate … this sounds very bad for Amber, and is a reminder that the attack before her July 2019 arrest was not an isolated incident.